MILLAY v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Filing 32

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting 7 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 12 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JOHN M. MILLAY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MAINE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF REHABILITATION, DIVISION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED) Defendant. Civil No. 1:11-CV-00438-NT ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's first Recommended Decision filed on May 16, 2012 (Doc. No. 12), the Recommended Decision is affirmed. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 2. The Maine Human Rights Act claim in Count I of the Plaintiff’s complaint, as filed on March 5, 2012 is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE on Eleventh amendment grounds. 3. The Americans with Disabilities Act claim in Count II of the Plaintiff’s complaint, as filed on March 5, 2012, is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE on Eleventh amendment grounds. 4. The Section 504 Rehabilitation Act claim in Count III of the Plaintiff’s complaint, as filed on March 5, 2012, is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE based on failure to state a claim; and 5. Leave to Amend to assert a Section 722(c) claim for any services other than a commuter subsidy is DENIED because Plaintiff has not yet exhausted 1 administrative remedies in relation to any other dispute over rehabilitation services. SO ORDERED. /s/Nancy Torresen United States District Judge Dated this 26th day of September, 2012. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?