HEATH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

Filing 18

ORDER adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 17 Report and Recommendations. for 12 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet, 11 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet filed by BRIDGIT L HEATH, 17 Report and Recommended Decision, By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mjlt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRIDGIT L. HEATH, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-99-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On December 30, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2013, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for proceedings not inconsistent with the Recommended Decision. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2013 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE (BANGOR) CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:12-CV-99-DBH Bridgit L. Heath, Plaintiff Represented By Stephen J. O’Donnell Goodspeed & O’Donnell P.O. Box 738 Augusta, ME 04332 (207) 622-6161 email: steve@goodspeedlaw.com v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant Represented By Matthew J. Del Mastro Veena Reddy Office of General Counsel, Region I Social Security Administration JFK Federal Building, Room 625 Boston, MA 02203-0002 (617) 565-4277 email: matthew.del.mastro@ssa.gov veena.reddy@ssa.gov 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?