MURPHY v. CORIZON et al

Filing 121

ORDER adopting 120 Report and Recommended Decision for for 110 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by KEN TOPEL, PRAVEEN PAVULURU, CORIZON and 118 Notification of Removal filed by CAROL MURPHY; granting 110 Motion for Summary Judgment; striking 118 Nofication of Removal. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
CAROL MURPHY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORIZON, et al.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12-cv-00101-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
On May 12, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a recommended decision,
recommending that this Court grant the Corizon Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 110). Recommended Decision on Mot. for Summ. J. (ECF No.
120). The Recommended Decision placed Ms. Murphy on notice that if she wished to
object to the Recommended Decision, she must file objections within fourteen days of
being served with the Recommended Decision. Id. at 12. It is now June 17, 2014 and
Ms. Murphy has not filed an objection. The Court therefore concludes that she has
waived any right to object to the recommendation contained in the Recommended
Decision. Furthermore, the Court has performed a de novo review of the decision and
concurs with the recommendations for the reasons set forth in detail in the
Recommended Decision.

The Court therefore ORDERS that the Recommended

Decision of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED and the Court GRANTS the Corizon
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 110). Judgment shall issue in

favor of Corizon, Inc., Dr. Parveen Pavuluru, and Kenn Topel and against Plaintiff
Carol Murphy.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Notification of Removal (ECF No. 118)
be and hereby is STRICKEN.
SO ORDERED.

/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 17th day of June, 2014

2