Filing 14

ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommended Decision for 7 Motion for Order for Conditional Judgment filed by GREGORY HARRIMAN and KATHRYN HARRIMAN and 9 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; denying 7 Motion for Order for Conditional Judgment; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. GREGORY HARRIMAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12-cv-00113-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 14, 2012 her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 12). The Defendants filed their objections to the Recommended Decision on July 2, 2012 (ECF No. 13). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Order for Conditional Judgment (ECF No. 7) be and hereby is DENIED. 3. It is further ORDERED that Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (ECF No. 9) be and hereby is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. /s/John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 27th day of July, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?