MACHIAVELLI v. BARNHART
Filing
19
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 16 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
ANTHONY T.C. MACHIAVELLI,
Plaintiff
v.
PATRICIA BARNHART,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:12-cv-00200-GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 17, 2012, her
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision
(ECF No. 18) on November 1, 2012.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that
no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF
No. 1) is DENIED.
3.
It is also hereby ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue in the
event Plaintiff files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the
denial of a constitutional right as contemplated by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 5th day of November 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?