PLATO v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Filing
35
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 25 Report and Recommendations for 11 Motion Remand to Agency filed by JENNIFER PLATO, 10 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JENNIFER R. PLATO,
PLAINTIFF
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
DEFENDANT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-319-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On July 18, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision.
The
plaintiff filed her objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision on
August 12, 2013. Oral argument was held on September 23, 2013. I have
reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire
record. To the degree that it is not implicit in the Recommended Decision that
the Magistrate Judge considered the new evidence cumulatively as well as
separately, I find on de novo review that, considered cumulatively, the new
evidence does not justify granting the plaintiff’s motion to remand.
I have
made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended
Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States
Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and
determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s motion for remand is DENIED and the
Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?