CIANBRO COMPANIES v. UREMOVICH et al
Filing
40
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 34 Report and Recommendations for 26 Motion to Dismiss. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
CIANBRO COMPANIES,
PLAINTIFF
v.
MICHAEL UREMOVICH,
ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 1:12-cv-330-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On January 28, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copies to counsel, her Recommended Decision on the defendants’
motion to dismiss and Order denying the defendants’ motion for oral argument.
The defendants filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on February 6,
2013.
I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters
adjudicated
by
the
Recommended
Decision;
and
I
concur
with
the
recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set
forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding
is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to
Counts I through IV, but GRANTED as to Count V.
The defendants shall file a full response to the motion for preliminary
injunction by March 11, 2013.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?