GRANT v. BOUFFARD

Filing 12

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 11 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
CHRISTOPHER GRANT,
Petitioner
v.
RODNEY BOUFFARD,
Respondent

)
)
)
)
) Docket no. 1:13-cv-00113-NT
)
)
)
)

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On July 11, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court,
with copies to counsel, her Report and Recommended Decision. The time within
which to file objections expired on July 25, 2013, and no objections have been filed.
The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their
right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Further a certificate of appealability shall not issue in the event the Petitioner files
a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

/s/ Nancy Torresen
United States District Judge
Dated this 26th day of August, 2013