REESE v. BOUFFARD et al
Filing
54
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 47 Report and Recommendations, granting 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and denying 51 Motion to Amend. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
GEOFFREY REESE,
Plaintiff
v.
ROBERT BOUFFARD, et als.,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:14-cv-00244-GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 28, 2015, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 47). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision
(ECF No. 50) on April 1, 2015. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 52) on April 6, 2015.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine
that no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 44) is
GRANTED.
3.
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint
(ECF No. 51) is DENIED.
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 29th day of April, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?