REESE v. STATE OF MAINE

Filing 11

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying as moot 6 Motion for Order; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 9 Report and Recommendations; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (nwd)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE

GEOFFREY DEMOND REESE,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF MAINE,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:14-cr-00344-GZS

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on December 10, 2014, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 9). Petitioner filed his Objection to the Recommended
Decision (ECF No. 10) on December 31, 2014.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine
that no further proceeding is necessary.
1.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
(ECF No. 9) is hereby AFFIRMED.

2.

It is hereby ORDERED that Petition Under Section 2254 (ECF No. 1) is
DISMISSED.

3.

It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Release (ECF No. 6) is
DENIED as moot.

4.

It is hereby ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall not be issued
because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within
the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

/s/George Z. Singal
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 6th day of January, 2015.