DREWRY v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 282 Report and Recommendations; granting 203 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 276 Objection on Motion to Extend Time. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
BRANDON B. DREWRY,
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, et al,
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on March 21, 2017, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 282). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended
Decision (ECF No. 293) on April 10, 2017, as well as an additional Attachment (ECF 296) on
April 10, 2017. Defendants filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended
Decision (ECF No. 304) on April 24, 2017.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine
that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 203) is GRANTED, and judgment is entered for Defendants.
It is also hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Objection to Order on Motion to
Extend Time to File Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 276)
is DENIED AS MOOT.
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 2nd day of May, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?