OUELLETTE v. STATE OF MAINE et al

Filing 12

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 Report and Recommendations, denying 8 Motion for Relief from Reprisal, denying 9 Motion to Amend Complaint; denying 10 Motion to Join; denying 11 Motion to Join and Amend. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine

DANIEL OUELLETTE,
Plaintiff
v.
STATE OF MAINE, et als.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:14-cv-00450-GZS

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 6, 2015, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 6). Since entry of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, Plaintiff has filed an Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 7) on January 22,
2015. Plaintiff has also filed four motions (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10 & 11) which, to the extent may be
considered objections, have also been reviewed.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that
no further proceeding is necessary.
1.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.

2.

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED in
its entirety.

3.

Plaintiff’s Motions (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10 & 11) are DENIED.

/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 30th day of January, 2015.