HURT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 32

ORDER REGARDING SANCTIONS By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (mjlt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 1:14-cv-518-GZS ) ) ) ) ) ____________________________________________________________________________ TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 1:14-cv-519-GZS ) ) ) ) ) ORDER REGARDING SANCTIONS Before the Court are several illegible documents Mr. Hurt has repeatedly sent to the Clerk’s Office for filing. The Clerk’s Office has returned these pleadings to Mr. Hurt as instructed to do so by my Order dated December 9, 2014. Mr. Hurt has failed to comply with my previous Order issued on December 9, 2014, to wit, his documents are not legible nor has he filed a Motion for Leave to File. A quick review of the documents shows that Mr. Hurt has made no effort to improve his filings and continues to simply mail papers to this Court that state no cognizable claim. These filings appear designed to simply waste the Court’s time and resources and thereby delay the administration of justice in other cases. Further, the Clerk’s Office is incurring postage costs to return such filings to Mr. Hurt, to only have those documents reshipped to the Clerk’s Office, which are subsequently returned to Mr. Hurt again. Should Mr. Hurt continue to mail documents, without a Motion for Leave to File the Clerk’s Office is directed NOT to docket the documents but, rather treat them as “correspondence” and not return the documents to Mr. Hurt. The documents will then be destroyed in accordance with the record disposition schedule approved by the Judicial Conference. SO ORDERED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated this 12th day of August, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?