DREWRY v. STATE OF MAINE

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Motion for Enlargement of Time to File a Habeas Petition filed by BRANDON B. DREWRY and 3 Motion for Copies, Typewriter, Laptop, iPad and Printer filed by BRANDON B. DREWRY; denying 1 Motion for Enlargement of Time to File a Habeas Petition; dismissing as moot 2 Motion for Copies, Typewriter, Laptop, iPad and Printer. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
BRANDON B. DREWRY,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF MAINE,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:14-mc-00187-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September
18, 2014 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 3).

The Plaintiff filed his

objections to the Recommended Decision on October 6, 2014 (ECF No. 4). I
have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Motion for
Enlargement of Time to File a Habeas Petition (ECF No. 1) be and
hereby is DENIED.

3. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Motion for Copies,
Typewriter, Laptop, iPad and Printer (ECF No. 2) be and hereby is
DISMISSED as moot.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 7th day of October, 2014

2