COLLINS v. BOUFFARD

Filing 8

ORDER affirming 6 Report and Recommended Decision denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by KEVIN J COLLINS, No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (jgw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
KEVIN J. COLLINS,
Petitioner,
v.
RODNEY BOUFFARD, Warden,
Maine State Prison
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 1:15-cv-164-NT

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 1,
2015 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 6).

The Petitioner filed its

Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 7) on June 23, 2015.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is

necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.

It is hereby ORDERED that

Movant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. It is hereby
ORDERED that no certificate of appealibility shall issue because there is no
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning
of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen
United States Chief District Judge
Dated this 14th day of June, 2015.

2