MOUNTAIN VALLEY PROPERTY INC v. APPLIED RISK SERVICES INC et al

Filing 65

PROCEDURAL ORDER - By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PROPERTY,
INC.,
PLAINTIFF
V.

APPLIED RISK SERVICES, INC.,
AL.,

ET

DEFENDANTS

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 1:15-CV-187-DBH

PROCEDURAL ORDER
I have denied the motion to vacate the Arbitrator’s decision that the
dispute between Mountain Valley Property, Inc. and the defendant Applied
Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc. (“AUCRA”) is not arbitrable,
and that dispute is now proceeding in this court. Therefore, I now LIFT the stay
of the lawsuit against the other defendants, a stay that I entered on February
25, 2016, when I referred the Mountain Valley/AUCRA dispute to arbitration.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2016
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE