NOLL v. FLOWERS FOODS INC et al
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT granting 279 Motion to Amend. REMINDER: After entry of this Order, if Amending a COMPLAINT, counsel are REQUIRED to separately file the AMENDED COMPLAINT Document. By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (CJD)
Case 1:15-cv-00493-LEW Document 287 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 3
PageID #: 8210
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
TIMOTHY NOLL, individually and,
on behalf of similarly situated
FLOWERS FOODS INC, LEPAGE
BAKERIES PARK STREET, LLC., and )
CK SALES CO., LLC,
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT
On January 29, 2020, I granted partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants
on Plaintiff’s state law class action seeking payment of overtime compensation. Summary
Judgment Order (ECF No. 262). On August 3, 2020, I granted Defendants’ motion to
decertify the related FLSA collective action, dismissed Timothy Noll’s FLSA claims with
prejudice, and dismissed the FLSA claims of the opt-in plaintiffs without prejudice. Order
on Defendants’ Motion for Decertification of FLSA Collective Action (ECF No. 277). On
August 4, 2020, final judgment entered dismissing all claims in the action. Judgment (ECF
The matter is now before me on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Judgment
(ECF No. 279). Plaintiff observes that final judgment was not appropriate at this juncture
because a state law class action claim for invalid paycheck deductions remains in the case,
Case 1:15-cv-00493-LEW Document 287 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 3
PageID #: 8211
which claim is found in Count IV of the Complaint, and which claim Defendants never
targeted with a dispositive motion. I last considered the claim in my January 15, 2019
Decision and Order (ECF No. 202), wherein I certified the claim to proceed on a class
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Judgment is GRANTED. The Judgment dated August
4, 2020, is VACATED. To the limited extent the Summary Judgment Order purported to
dismiss Count IV in its entirety, the Order is hereby amended to reinstate the state law
paycheck deduction claim in Count IV, i.e., the claim asserted under 26 M.R.S. § 629(1).
The order granting summary judgment and/or dismissing the other claims, including those
asserted in Count IV is, in all other respects, maintained. 1
On September 8, 2020, I convened a telephonic conference, at the parties’ request,
to discuss the schedule going forward. During the conference, the parties appeared to agree
that there is a need for further development of the expert witness reports. Defendants also
proposed a second summary judgment proceeding for the remaining claim in Count IV,
which proposal Plaintiff opposed. I instructed the parties to meet and confer and report
whether they can reach agreement as to these issues and, if not, to state their respective
positions. In addition, the parties are hereby instructed to meet and confer on the topic of
subject matter jurisdiction and to report their respective positions concerning the Court’s
In my Summary Judgment Order I granted Defendants’ request for judgment against Plaintiff’s state law class action
claim for unpaid overtime, based on the state law outside sales exemption, which exemption alleviates Defendants of
liability under Subchapter 3 of Chapter 7 of Title 26. See 26 M.R.S. §§ 663(3)(C), 664. That claim also is asserted
in Count IV, as are claims involving requests for civil penalties, which claims I dismissed for failure to state a claim.
The state law claim found in Count III also was dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Case 1:15-cv-00493-LEW Document 287 Filed 09/10/20 Page 3 of 3
PageID #: 8212
retention of jurisdiction over what remains of this case, pursuant to either the Class Action
Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), and/or the Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1367. Finally, the parties are instructed to confer and report concerning what, if anything,
remains on Count II (state law declaratory judgment) and Count V (contract rescission /
All status reports shall be filed by September 22, 2020.
Dated this 10th day of September, 2020.
/s/ Lance E. Walker
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?