EDSON v. LEPAGE et al

Filing 57

ORDER adopting 52 Report and Recommended Decision for 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by MICHELLE PARADIS, JAY HARPER, MARY MAYHEW, PAUL L LEPAGE, DAVID LOVEJOY, 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by COLLEEN CUTLER RN, 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by JAIME MEADER RN, 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by ALEXANDER RAEV PHD, JULIA WISE PA-C, 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by JASON TURNER, 19 Motion to Amend filed by ARLENE EDSON, 20 Motion to Amend Caption filed by ARLENE EDSON; dismissing as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; dismissing as moot 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; dismiss ing as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; dismissing as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing as moot 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 19 Motion to Amend; granting 20 Motion to Amend Caption. REMINDER: After entry of this Order, if Amending a COMPLAINT, counsel are REQUIRED to separately file the AMENDED COMPLAINT Document. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ARLENE EDSON, Plaintiff, v. RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:16-cv-00079-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision filed May 16, 2016 (ECF No. 52), the Recommended Decision is accepted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 19) be and hereby is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Caption (ECF No. 20) be and hereby is GRANTED; and, it is further ORDERED that the moving Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 6, 9, 10, 11 and 13) be and hereby are DISMISSED as moot. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 8th day of June, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?