LAVIGNE v. US TRUSTEE
Filing
14
STATUS ORDER. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
BEVERLY ANN LAVIGNE
v.
US TRUSTEE, et al.
)
)
)
)
)
1:16-cv-00098-JAW
STATUS ORDER
On February 17, 2016, Beverly Ann Lavigne filed a bankruptcy appeal with
this Court. Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election (ECF No. 1). When Ms.
Lavigne failed to designate a record on appeal, the Court issued an Order to Show
Cause on March 17, 2016. Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 3). Ms. Lavigne moved to
extend the time to respond to the Order to Show Cause, Mot. for Time Extensions to
Prepare Docs. (ECF No. 4), and on March 25, 2016, the Court issued an order over
the objections of the Bank of New York Mellon, Vivian Savage, and Gail Ferry,
granting the motion for extension and giving Ms. Lavigne until April 25, 2016 to
comply with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy 8009(a)(1). Order on Mot. for Extension
(ECF No. 8). On March 29, 2016, Ms. Lavigne filed a letter with this Court setting
forth the issues on appeal and designating the record upon which she intends to rely.
Statement of Issues to Designate a Record (ECF No. 9). On April 22, 2016, Ms.
Lavigne filed a reply to the motion to show cause. Reply Mot. for Mot. to Show Cause
(ECF No. 13). To be clear, Ms. Lavigne’s March 29, 2016 filing facially complies with
Rule 8009(a)(1) and therefore the Court deems the Order to Show Cause satisfied and
the Order to Show Cause has been terminated.
Regarding the status of the case, the Court observes that Ms. Lavigne filed a
motion for temporary restraining order on April 19, 2016. Pet. for Ex Parte TRO and
for Inj. from Harassment or Interference with Business “Me. Cottage Getaways” Prop.
(ECF No. 10). The Court anticipates the Defendants will respond to Ms. Lavigne’s
motion as appropriate in the ordinary course.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 25th day of April, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?