ANCTIL v. FITZPATRICK et al

Filing 131

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment; accepting Report and Recommendations re: 93 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RANDALL LIBERTY, RODNEY BOUFFARD, TROY ROSS By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
STEVE ANCTIL, JR.
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER JOSEPH
FITZPATRICK, et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:16-cv-00107-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on December 13, 2018
his Recommended Decision on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
126). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on January 14,
2019 (ECF No. 129), and the Defendants filed their response to those objections on
January 22, 2019 (ECF No. 130). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate
Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de
novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States
Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and
determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 126) is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 93) be and hereby is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 8th day of February 2019.

2