ANCTIL v. FITZPATRICK et al

Filing 39

ORDER adopting 36 Report and Recommended Decision for 31 Amended Complaint filed by STEVE ANCTIL JR. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
STEVE ANCTIL, JR.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, et al.,
Defendants.

1:16-cv-00107-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision filed October 24, 2016 (ECF No. 36), the Recommended Decision is
accepted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that all of the Plaintiff’s claims
except for Plaintiff’s failure to protect/failure to train claim against
Defendant Ross be and hereby are DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 5th day of December, 2016