Filing 27

ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Complaint filed by ERIC ERICSON; dismissing 1 Complaint. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ERIC ERICSON, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT LANDRY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:16-cv-00170-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on August 25, 2016 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on November 9, 2016 (ECF No. 24). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be and hereby is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 29th day of August, 2016 On December 14, 2016, Eric Ericson filed two identical motions to stay proceedings asking for sixty days to prepare and file an amended complaint. Pl. Eric Ericson’s Mot. for Stay of Proceedings and Mot. for Leave to File Am. Compl. (ECF No. 25) (1:16cv-00170-JAW); (ECF No. 27) (1:16-cv-00171-JAW). More than sixty days have passed since Mr. Ericson filed his December 14, 2016 motions and the Court has received no proposed amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice his motions for stay and motions for leave to file amended complaint. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 3rd day of April, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?