ERICSON v. LANDRY

Filing 27

ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Complaint filed by ERIC ERICSON; dismissing 1 Complaint. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
ERIC ERICSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT LANDRY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:16-cv-00170-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on August 25, 2016
his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the
Recommended Decision on November 9, 2016 (ECF No. 24). I have reviewed and
considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire
record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations
of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended
Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1)
be and hereby is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 29th day of August, 2016

On December 14, 2016, Eric Ericson filed two identical motions to stay proceedings
asking for sixty days to prepare and file an amended complaint. Pl. Eric Ericson’s
Mot. for Stay of Proceedings and Mot. for Leave to File Am. Compl. (ECF No. 25) (1:16cv-00170-JAW); (ECF No. 27) (1:16-cv-00171-JAW).

More than sixty days have

passed since Mr. Ericson filed his December 14, 2016 motions and the Court has
received no proposed amended complaint.

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES

without prejudice his motions for stay and motions for leave to file amended
complaint.

SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 3rd day of April, 2017

2