ERICSON v. LANDRY
AMENDED ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Complaint filed by ERIC ERICSON; dismissing 1 Complaint. Please see footnote 1 of this Amended Order for the corrections. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
AMENDED1 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on August 25, 2016
his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the
Recommended Decision on November 9, 2016 (ECF No. 24). I have reviewed and
considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire
record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations
of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended
Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1)
be and hereby is DISMISSED.
This Amended Order removes the extra text after the signature line contained in the Order
Affirming (ECF No. 27) and corrects the date from August 29, 2016 to April 3, 2017.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 3rd day of April, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?