Filing 28

AMENDED ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Complaint filed by ERIC ERICSON; dismissing 1 Complaint. Please see footnote 1 of this Amended Order for the corrections. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ERIC ERICSON, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT LANDRY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:16-cv-00170-JAW AMENDED1 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on August 25, 2016 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on November 9, 2016 (ECF No. 24). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be and hereby is DISMISSED. This Amended Order removes the extra text after the signature line contained in the Order Affirming (ECF No. 27) and corrects the date from August 29, 2016 to April 3, 2017. 1 SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 3rd day of April, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?