MANLEY v. LIBERTY

Filing 9

ORDER affirming Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge re 5 Report and Recommendations dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAMES M MANLEY. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jwr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JAMES M. MANLEY, PETITIONER V. RANDALL LIBERTY, RESPONDENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:16-CV-249-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On February 10, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on March 9, 2017. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and the petition is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases shall not issue because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?