MOORE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 117

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting 111 Report and Recommendations; denying 89 Motion for Order for Medical Services; denying 101 Motion Requesting Judicial Review De Novo and denying 110 Second MOTION Requesting Judicial Review. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
WALTER WILLIAM MOORE a/k/a
Nikki Natasha Petrovickov,
Plaintiff,
v.
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 1:16-cv-398-NT

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED
DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On May 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with
copy to the parties, his Recommended Decision on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Order of
Medical Services (ECF No. 89), Plaintiff’s First Motion Requesting Judicial Review
(ECF No. 101), and Plaintiff’s Second Motion Requesting Judicial Review (ECF No.
110). Recommended Decision (ECF No. 111). The Plaintiff filed two objections to the
Recommended Decision on May 24, 2018 (ECF Nos. 112 and 114). The Defendants
Correct Care Solutions, Robert Clinton, M.D., and Correctional Medical Services,
Incorporated filed a response to the Plaintiff’s objection. (ECF No. 115). I have
reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record;
I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended
Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and the Plaintiff’s Motion for Order of Medical Services

(ECF No. 89), the Plaintiff’s First Motion Requesting Judicial Review (ECF No. 101),
and the Plaintiff’s Second Motion Requesting Judicial Review (ECF No. 110) are
DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen__________________
United States Chief District Judge
Dated this 11th day of June, 2018.

2