Filing 12

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 8 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Complaint filed by SIDNEY P. KILMARTIN and 6 Amended Complaint filed by SIDNEY P. KILMARTIN; dismissing 1 Complaint and dismissing 6 Amended Complaint. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS) Modified on 5/25/2017 to clarify text (sfw).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE SIDNEY P. KILMARTIN, Plaintiff, v. MARTY RIDGE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:17-cv-00097-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 1, 2017 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 8). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on May 23, 2017 (ECF No. 11). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) and Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) be and hereby are DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 25th day of May, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?