KILMARTIN v. RIDGE

Filing 12

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 8 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Complaint filed by SIDNEY P. KILMARTIN and 6 Amended Complaint filed by SIDNEY P. KILMARTIN; dismissing 1 Complaint and dismissing 6 Amended Complaint. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS) Modified on 5/25/2017 to clarify text (sfw).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
SIDNEY P. KILMARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARTY RIDGE,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:17-cv-00097-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 1,
2017 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 8).

The Plaintiff filed his

objections to the Recommended Decision on May 23, 2017 (ECF No. 11). I
have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of
the Magistrate Judge be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF
No. 1) and Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) be and hereby
are DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 25th day of May, 2017

2