INMAN v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE DA CHRIS ALMY

Filing 12

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 denying 4 Motion for Bail and dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
FRANK INMAN,
Petitioner,
v.
PENOBSCOT COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OFFICE, et al.,
Respondents

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:17-cv-412-GZS

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision
(ECF No. 5) filed November 15, 2017, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Section 2254 Motion (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED, and his Motion
for Bail (ECF No. 4) is DENIED.
2. A certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing
Section 2254 cases is DENIED because there is no substantial showing of the
denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).

_/s/ George Z. Singal
__
United States District Judge
Dated this 12th day of February, 2018.