YOUNG v. PROGRESSIVE INS CO

Filing 53

ORDER REOPENING THE TIME TO FILE AN APPEAL By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MAURICE D. YOUNG, Individually, And on behalf of minor, T.A.Y., Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE INS. CO., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:18-cv-197-GZS ORDER REOPENING THE TIME TO FILE AN APPEAL On July 11, 2019, the First Circuit remanded this case for the limited purpose of considering whether the time to appeal the February 25, 2019 Judgment should be extended under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopened under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). Having reviewed the entire docket, it appears that the Clerk’s original mailing of the February 25, 2019 Order and Judgment (ECF No. 41 & 42) was returned unopened and that Plaintiff did not actually receive these docket items until after they were re-sent on April 17, 2019. See ECF No. 47. Under these circumstances, the Court concludes that Plaintiff did not receive notice of the February 25, 2019 Order & Judgment within 21 days of entry. He did then receive notice shortly after April 17, 2019. He subsequently filed a notice of appeal, along with related exhibits, on April 26, 2019. See ECF No. 48. Given Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court liberally construes Plaintiff’s April 26, 2019 filing as including a motion to reopen the time to appeal and further finds the motion was filed within the 14-day period required under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(B). Concluding that no party would be prejudiced by re-opening the time for appeal and allowing the consideration of Plaintiff’s appeal on the merits, the Court hereby reopens the appeal period nunc pro tunc thereby allowing for Plaintiff’s April 26, 2019 Notice of Appeal (ECF NO. 48) to be deemed a timely notice of appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this Order to the First Circuit. SO ORDERED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated this 15th day of July, 2019.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?