PELLETIER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
Filing
21
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 20 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (aks)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
ALAN P.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
) 1:20-cv-00221-JDL
)
ANDREW M. SAUL,
)
Commissioner of Social Security, )
)
Defendant.
)
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Alan P. seeks judicial review of the Social Security Administration
Commissioner’s final decision determining that he is not disabled and denying his
application for disability insurance benefits (ECF No. 1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 636(b)(3) and D. Me. Local R. 16.3(a)(2), United States Magistrate Judge John C.
Nivison held a hearing on Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors (ECF No. 15) on March 9,
2021. The Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision with the Court on April
29, 2021 (ECF No. 20), recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s
decision. The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have
been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would
waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
Having reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, I concur with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions as set forth in his
Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision
(ECF No. 20) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED, and the
Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated this 4th day of June, 2021.
/s/ JON D. LEVY
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?