CLERVRAIN v. DUNLAP et al

Filing 19

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENJOINING FURTHER FILINGS adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision, dismissing 17 MOTION for Relief from Judgment By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (clp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW DUNLAP, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:22-CV-82-LEW ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENJOINING FURTHER FILINGS On July 30, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed with the court, with copies to Plaintiff, his Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18) on Plainttiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 17). The time within which to file objections expired on August 13, 2024, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified Plaintiff that failure to object would waive the right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and a Cok order is issued barring Manetirony Clervrain from filing, without advance permission, any other action in this Court. The Clerk of this Court is directed to refuse to receive, file, or docket, without a prior order of this Court, any such paper submitted by or on behalf of Manetirony Clervrain (other than a timely notice of appeal from this Order to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit). If Manetirony Clervrain wishes to appeal this Order, he shall file a paper notice of appeal with the Clerk’s Office of this Court within the time allowed by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 17) is dismissed. SO ORDERED. Dated this 28th day of August, 2024. /s/ Lance E. Walker Chief U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?