CLERVRAIN v. DUNLAP et al
Filing
19
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENJOINING FURTHER FILINGS adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision, dismissing 17 MOTION for Relief from Judgment By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (clp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MATTHEW DUNLAP, et al.,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:22-CV-82-LEW
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND ENJOINING FURTHER FILINGS
On July 30, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed with
the court, with copies to Plaintiff, his Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No.
18) on Plainttiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 17). The time within
which to file objections expired on August 13, 2024, and no objections have been
filed. The Magistrate Judge notified Plaintiff that failure to object would waive the
right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and a Cok order is issued barring
Manetirony Clervrain from filing, without advance permission, any other action in
this Court.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to refuse to receive, file, or docket, without
a prior order of this Court, any such paper submitted by or on behalf of Manetirony
Clervrain (other than a timely notice of appeal from this Order to the United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit). If Manetirony Clervrain wishes to appeal
this Order, he shall file a paper notice of appeal with the Clerk’s Office of this Court
within the time allowed by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 17) is dismissed.
SO ORDERED.
Dated this 28th day of August, 2024.
/s/ Lance E. Walker
Chief U.S. District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?