RICHES v. FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM et al

Filing 3

REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 1 Complaint,, filed by JONATHAN LEE RICHES Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2007 By Judge MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (err, )

Download PDF
RICHES v. FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM et al Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-00124-GZS Document 3 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JONATHAN LEE RICHES Plaintiff v. FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM, et als. Defendants ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2:7-124-P-S ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED DECISION On July 16, 2007, I issued an Order that Plaintiff either pay the required filing fee or file a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, by August 6, 2007 failing which I would issue a recommendation that the action be dismissed. As of today's date, Plaintiff has neither paid the required filing fee nor filed a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Complaint be DISMISSED. NOTICE A party may file objections to those specified portions of a magistrate judge's report or proposed findings or recommended decisions entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) (1993) for which de novo review by the district court is sought, together with a supporting memorandum, within ten (10) days of being served with a copy thereof. A responsive memorandum shall be filed within ten (10) days after the filing of the objection. Failure to file a timely objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to de novo review by the district court and to appeal the district court's order. August 8, 2007 /s/ Margaret J. Kravchuk U.S. Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?