SPOONER v. BOYNE USA INC et al

Filing 79

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 69 Report and Recommendations; Granting in part 54 Motion for Sanctions; Denying 55 Motion for Default Judgment. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine JASON SPOONER, Plaintiff v. DAN EGAN and EEN, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 08-262-P-S ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 21, 2009, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 69). Defendants filed their Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 73) on August 5, 2009. Plaintiff filed his Response to Defendants' Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 78) on August 17, 2009. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. 2. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion Entry of Default Judgment (Docket No. 55) is DENIED. 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 54) is GRANTED IN PART as more specifically set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision. The recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is fully adopted. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated: August 19, 2008

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?