MILLER et al v. NICHOLS et al

Filing 11

ORDER REQUIRING REVISED REDACTED FILING By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (mjlt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JANEEN MILLER, et al.,, Plaintiffs, v. KRISTEN NICHOLS, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 2:08-cv-355-GZS ) ) ) ) ) ORDER REQUIRING REVISED REDACTED FILING The Court's recent review of the docket in this case has uncovered filings that fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.21; namely the Attachments to Plaintiffs' Motion to Temporary Restraining Order (Docket #s 7-2 ­ 814). Plaintiffs' counsel is hereby instructed to cure this violation of Rule 5.2 by filing a properly redacted version of the document within seven days of this Order. In accordance with Rule 5.2(e), the Court hereby ORDERS that the Attachments to Plaintiffs' Motion to Temporary Restraining Order (Docket #s 7-2 ­ 8-14) be SEALED in order to prohibit remote electronic access to the document by any nonparty. Counsel are reminded that under both Rule 5.2 and the District's Administrative Procedures Governing the Filing and Service by Electronic Means, it is their responsibility to ensure that all filings are properly redacted. SO ORDERED. /s/ George Z. Singal Chief U.S. District Judge Dated this 12th day of November, 2008. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 became effective on December 1, 2007. Even prior to that date, redaction of personal identifiers was required pursuant to the District's Administrative Procedures Governing the Filing and Service by Electronic Means. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?