USA v. HAMILTON

Filing 9

ORDER ON MOTION TO APPROVE COVER LETTER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Approve Cover Letter. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONNA HAMILTON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 2:09-cv-64-P-S ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO APPROVE COVER LETTER Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Approve Cover Letter (Docket # 6). The Government filed its opposition to the Motion attaching a proposed cover letter (Gov't Ex. 1 (Docket # 7-2)) different from the cover letter Defendant attached to its Motion (Def. Ex. A (Docket # 6)). Having reviewed both cover letters, the Court now GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant's Motion. The Court hereby approves the cover letter contained in Defendant's Exhibit A minus the third full paragraph.1 With the third full paragraph stricken, Defendant is to utilize Exhibit A as the Court-approved cover letter required by the February 18, 2009 Order of Permanent Injunction. Defendant shall complete the mailing contemplated by the Order of Permanent Injunction within 14 days of this Order and immediately thereafter file her sworn certification certifying compliance with the mailing requirement. Defendant shall attach a final copy of the Court-approved cover letter used for the mailing to that certification. SO ORDERED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated this 7th day of April, 2009 1 The third full paragraph of Defendant Exhibit A reads: I deny all of the allegations in that Complaint. However, because I have not prepared any tax returns for almost a year now, and do not intend to prepare any tax returns ever again, I voluntarily agreed that the court could enter an order permanently enjoining me from ever preparing or assisting others in preparing tax returns again, without admitting fault for anything.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?