ZIEHM v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION

Filing 92

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 85 Report and Recommendations; granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion to Strike. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
ZIEHM v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION Doc. 92 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine JOSEPH T. ZIEHM, Plaintiff v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 09-69-P-S ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 22, 2010, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 85). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 86) on June 8, 2010. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 91) on June 29, 2010. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. 2. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 62) is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. Dockets.Justia.com 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 36 ) is GRANTED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated: July 1, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?