RARED COMPANY, INC v. RITE AID OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC et al
Filing
41
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 32 Report and Recommendations and 18 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
RARED MANCHESTER NH, LLC,
Plaintiff
v.
RITE AID OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
INC., et al
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:10-cv-203-GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 6, 2011, her
Recommended Decision (Docket No. 32).
Plaintiff filed its Objection to the Recommended
Decision (Docket No. 33) on September 20, 2011. Defendants filed their Objections to the
Recommended Decision (Docket No. 34) on September 22, 2011. Defendants filed their Response
to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 37) on October 7, 2011.
Plaintiff filed its Response to Defendants’ Objections to the Recommended Decision (Docket No.
40) on October 12, 2011.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that
no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket
No. 18) is GRANTED.
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 14th day of October, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?