WILSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Filing
22
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 16 Report and Recommendations for 10 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet, denying 18 Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (mjlt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
DEBBIE L. WILSON,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
Of Social Security,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:10-cv-358-GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 30, 2011, his Recommended
Decision (Docket No. 16). Plaintiff filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No.
17) on July 14, 2011.
The Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the
Recommended Decision (Docket No. 20) on July 22, 2011. In addition, Plaintiff file a Request for
Oral Argument on her objection (Docket No. 18) on July 18, 2011. Defendant filed its objection to
Plaintiff’s Request for Oral Argument (Docket No. 21) on July 22, 2011.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that
no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is
hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
It is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Decision is AFFIRMED.
3.
It is also hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Request for Oral Argument (Docket
No. 18) is DENIED.
/s/George Z. Singal__________
U.S. District Judge
Dated: August 15, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?