WILSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

Filing 22

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 16 Report and Recommendations for 10 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet, denying 18 Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (mjlt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine DEBBIE L. WILSON, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:10-cv-358-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 30, 2011, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 16). Plaintiff filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 17) on July 14, 2011. The Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 20) on July 22, 2011. In addition, Plaintiff file a Request for Oral Argument on her objection (Docket No. 18) on July 18, 2011. Defendant filed its objection to Plaintiff’s Request for Oral Argument (Docket No. 21) on July 22, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Decision is AFFIRMED. 3. It is also hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Request for Oral Argument (Docket No. 18) is DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal__________ U.S. District Judge Dated: August 15, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?