USA v. JORDAN et al

Filing 33

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting 29 Report and Recommendations ; dismissing 17 Motion to Exclude; granting 18 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. STEVEN C. JORDAN, SCOTT S., GERSTMAR, STATE OF MAINE, and TOWN OF BOOTHBY HARBOR, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:10-cv-388-GZS Defendant ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 30, 2011, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 29). Defendants filed their Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 31) on October 14, 2011. Plaintiff filed its Response to Defendants’ Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 32) on October 27, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. The Court AFFIRMS the denial for leave to file a sur-reply (Doc. No. 26). 3. It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18) is GRANTED. 4. It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Testimony of the Plaintiff’s Expert Witness (Doc. No. 17) is DISMISSED without prejudice. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 3rd day of November, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?