ZAGKLARA v. SPRAGUE ENERGY CORP
Filing
55
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
EIRINI SAGKLARA,
Plaintiff
v.
SPRAGUE ENERGY CORP.,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:10-cv-445-GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 13, 2011, his Recommended
Decision (Docket No. 49).
Defendant Sprague Energy Corp. filed its Opposition to the
Recommended Decision (Docket No. 50) on July 27, 2011.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that
no further proceeding is necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
2.
For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Sprague Energy’s
deadline for service on third-party defendant Leopard Shipping and third-party
defendant Nomikos Transworld Maritime is extended nunc pro tunc to the date on
which service was, in fact, accomplished, June 2, 2011.
3.
For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Sprague Energy’s
deadline for service of the third-party complaint on Armada (Greece) Co. Ltd. is
extended 120 days from the order to show cause, or September 23, 2011.
4.
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Sprague Energy has not demonstrated a good
cause why Armada Shipping Co., Inc. has not been served; and, therefore, Defendant
Sprague’s third-party complaint is DISMISSED as to Armada Shipping Co., Inc.
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 23rd day of August, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?