FRIENDS OF MERRYMEETING BAY et al v. MILLER HYDRO GROUP

Filing 17

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE FRIENDS OF MERRYMEETING BAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MILLER HYDRO GROUP, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:11-cv-36-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 14, 2011, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 11). Defendant Miller Hydro Group filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 12) on August 1, 2011. Plaintiffs filed their response to Defendant’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 15) on August 18, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision. I note that while nothing in the current record supports a stay of this action at this time, the denial of the request for a stay is without prejudice to Defendant renewing the request if it can provide documentation that the ESA administrative consultation process will result in final agency action by a date certain in the near future. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 7) is hereby DENIED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated this 9th day of September, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?