ANGELA ADAMS LICENSING LLC et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al

Filing 38

ORDER AFFIRMING THERECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 34 - denying 24 Motion to Dismiss; denying 19 Motion to Dismiss. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (cef)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine

ANGELA ADAMS LICENSING, LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
WALMART STORES, INC., et al.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:11-cv-229-GZS

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on November 18, 2011, his
Recommended Decision (Docket No. 34). DefendantsWalmart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.com USA,
LLC filed their Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 35) on December 5, 2011.
Defendant Mohawk Industries, Inc. filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No.
36) on December 5, 2011. Plaintiffs’ filed their consolidated Response to Defendants’ Objections to
the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 37) on December 19, 2011.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that
no further proceeding is necessary.
1.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.

2.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19) filed by
Defendants Walmart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.com USA, LLC is hereby DENIED.

3.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 24) filed by
Defendants Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Target Corporation is hereby DENIED.

/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 21st day of December, 2011.