AFFO et al v. GRANITE BAY CARE INC et al
Filing
49
REPORT OF PRE-FILING CONFERENCE UNDER LOCAL RULE 56 - By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
KAYI AFFO, ET AL.,
)
)
PLAINTIFFS
)
)
v.
)
)
GRANITE BAY CARE, INC., ET AL., )
)
)
DEFENDANTS
CIVIL NO. 2:11-CV-482-DBH
consolidated with
CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-115-DBH
CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-162-DBH
REPORT OF PRE-FILING CONFERENCE UNDER LOCAL RULE 56
A pre-trial filing conference was held on October 23, 2012.
The plaintiffs stated that they plan to file a motion on the state law
minimum wage claims because there are no statutory affirmative defenses.
The issue to be decided on the state law claim is whether the plaintiffs should
be classified as employees or independent contractors.
The plaintiffs also
advised that they do not plan to file for summary judgment on the Fair Labor
Standards Act claim.
The defendants also expect to file two motions for summary judgment on
the federal and state law claims―one by the individual defendants and the
other by all defendants. The parties agreed that there will be more issues of
fact on the affirmative defenses available for the federal claim than issues of
fact under the state law wage claim.
The plaintiffs suggested I decide their motion on the state law claims first
explaining that if the defendants were found liable on that claim then the case
could be settled and it would be unnecessary to decide the federal claims. The
defendants thought this was a fair approach to the case. I urged the parties to
try to present a stipulated record on the state law independent contractor
issue.
The following deadlines were established by agreement:
November 9, 2012, for any stipulations of fact. The deadline was
later extended to November 15, 2012.
December 7, 2012, for motions for summary judgment.
January 4, 2013, responses are due.
January 18, 2013, replies are due.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?