HOOKER v. USA et al
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 36 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JOSEPH N LAPLANTE. (dfr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Hooker
v.
Civil No. 12-cv-346-JL
USA et al
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated
December 18, 2013.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the
objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the
district court and those not preserved by such objection are
precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988));
see also
United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: January 13, 2014
cc:
JOHN G. OSBORN, AUSA
SAMUEL HOOKER , PRO SE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?