HOOKER v. USA et al
Filing
70
ORDER re: adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 65 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JOSEPH N LAPLANTE. (mjlt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SAMUEL HOOKER
v.
USDC-ME Civil No.
2:12-cv-00346-JNL
USA et al
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated July 23, 2014. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal). Additionally, finding that the
petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the
denial of a constitutional right, the court declines to issue a
certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.§ 2253(c)(2); Rule
11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254;
First Cir. LR 22.0.
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: August 18, 2014
cc:
Samuel Hooker, Pro se
John G. Osborne, AUSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?