KARAS v. BARBER FOODS
Filing
11
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 10 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
PAULA J. KARAS,
PLAINTIFF
v.
BARBER FOODS,
DEFENDANT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-392-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On February 28, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copies to the parties, her Recommended Decision. The time within
which to file objections expired on March 18, 2013, and no objections have
been filed.
The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object
would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendant’s motion to dismiss based upon lack
of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED.
Further, I place Paula J. Karas on NOTICE that filing restrictions “may be
in the offing.” Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir.
1993).
This represents the “cautionary order” of which Cok speaks.
Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Id.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?