DAVISON v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 33

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 29 Report and Recommendations; denying 25 Motion to Amend; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine

LINDA E. DAVISON,
Plaintiff
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:13-cv-54-GZS

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on August 15, 2013, her
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff filed her Objection to the Recommended Decision
(ECF No. 30) on September 4, 2013. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 31) on September 18, 2013. Plaintiff filed a second Objection to
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 32) on October 4, 2013.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that
no further proceeding is necessary.
1.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.

2.

It is hereby ORDERED Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 25) is DENIED.

3.

It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12)1 is
GRANTED.

/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 7th day of October, 2013.

The Recommended Decision on page 11 references ECF No. “14” as Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss. The correct ECF notation for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is ECF No. “12.”
1