THOMPSON v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF et al
Filing
13
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 9 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by TREZJUAN THOMPSON. No Certificate of Appealability should i ssue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
TREZJUAN THOMPSON,
PETITIONER
v.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
SHERIFF AND UNITED STATES
MARSHAL SERVICE,
RESPONDENTS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:13-CV-60-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On July 18, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copies to the parties, her Recommended Decision on the petition for
writ of habeas corpus. On August 6, 2013, the Magistrate Judge instructed
the Clerk’s Office to send additional copies of her Recommended Decision to
the petitioner at USP Hazelton and FDC Philadelphia after a mailing to the
petitioner at the Cumberland County Jail was returned as undeliverable. The
time within which to file objections was extended to September 5, 2013. No
objections have been filed.
The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would
waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED.
The petitioner is DENIED relief under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241, WITH PREJUDICE, and the petition is DISMISSED.
No certificate of appealability shall issue in the event the petitioner files a
notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?