ELLIS v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al

Filing 21

ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision for 13 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA) filed by UNUM GROUP, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and 14 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA) filed by TODD ELLIS, granting 13 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA); denying 14 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA). By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE TODD ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:13-cv-00080-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 30, 2013 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on October 17, 2013 (ECF No. 19), and the Defendants filed their Responses to those objections on November 1, 2013 (ECF No. 20). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (ECF No. 13) be and hereby is GRANTED. 3. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record (ECF No. 14) be and hereby is DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 22nd day of January, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?