ELLIS v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
Filing
21
ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommended Decision for 13 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA) filed by UNUM GROUP, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and 14 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA) filed by TODD ELLIS, granting 13 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA); denying 14 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA). By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
TODD ELLIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:13-cv-00080-JAW
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September
30, 2013 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18). The Plaintiff filed his
objections to the Recommended Decision on October 17, 2013 (ECF No. 19),
and the Defendants filed their Responses to those objections on November 1,
2013 (ECF No. 20). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's
Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de
novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary.
1.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on
the Administrative Record (ECF No. 13) be and hereby is
GRANTED.
3. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the
Record (ECF No. 14) be and hereby is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 22nd day of January, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?