HENDERSON v. ROGERS et al
Filing
26
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting 15 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 22 Report and Recommendations. ; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mjlt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
THOMAS HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
VICTORIA ROGERS, et al.,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 2:14-cv-362-NT
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on March 3,
2015 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 22).
The Plaintiff filed his
Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 23) on March 16, 2015.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
It is further ORDERED that:
The Correctional Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (ECF
No. 11);
The Medical Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (ECF No.
15);
The Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim is DISMISSED with
prejudice; and
The Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the Plaintiff’s state law
claims and, therefore, those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen
United States Chief District Judge
Dated this 18th day of March, 2015.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?