HENDERSON v. MAINE PAROLE BOARD

Filing 6

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 3 Report and Recommendations-for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JOBEY HENDERSON
Petitioner,
v.
PAROLE BOARD,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 2:14-cv-00374-NT

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 9,
2014 his Order and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 3). The Petitioner filed
his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 5) on November 3,
2014.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the

1

Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that
the Complaint be dismissed. No Certificate of Appealability should issue
because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See
Fed. R. App. P. 22b; First Circuit Local Rule 22.1
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 14th day of November, 2014.

2